Socio-Economic Effects of Ocean Acidification

 

The World’s Oceans are a sink for CO2, with various factors affecting carbon uptake including wind, sea surface temperature, and biota. Since the industrial revolution anthropogenic emissions of CO2 have increased, this has led to an increase in CO2 in the oceans. So far around 500 billion tons, approximately one third of CO2 emitted, has been absorbed by the oceans (NRDC, 2009). Have you ever considered how much CO2 your lifestyle creates or thought about trying to reduce it? The rise in CO2 in seawater has already increased the acidity of the by 0.1 pH units since the industrial revolution, and pH could by the end of this century decrease by a further 0.3-0.4 pH units. Increased CO2 in seawater leads to the formation of carbonic acid which causes ocean acidification. The oceans act as a buffering system taking up excess amounts of CO2 which control the pH of seawater by a series of reactions (IPCC, 2007):

                        CO2 + H2O —>  H2CO3 —> H+ + HCO3- —> 2H+ + CO32-                               

Carbon dioxide + Water —> Carbonic acid —> Bicarbonate —> carbonate

Over the time the amount of CO2 in the oceans with increase the chemical reactions taking place with the ocean. Just looking at the reaction above would imply that the amount of carbonate within the ocean would increase however this will not be the case. In fact the carbonate reacts with the seawater to produce more bicarbonate, as is shown in the equation below:

               CO2 + H2O + CO32- —> HCO3- + H+ +CO32- —> 2HCO3-

Carbon dioxide + Water + Carbonate —> Bicarbonate + Carbonate —> Bicarbonate

The amount of carbonate is in oceans will decrease but the amount of bicarbonate found will increase. The reduction in carbonate affects key calcifying organisms, such as coral and plankton which use calcium carbonate to form their hard shells and skeletons (Iglesias-Rodriguez et al. 2008).  These key organisms form the base of marine food webs, any change in the species has the potential to impact entire ecosystems (NOAA, 2008). This study examines the socio-economic effects that ocean acidification could bring.

The impact of reduced carbonate and pH will travel through the marine environment. Some types of plankton may be unable to maintain their hard exterior, meaning a decrease in the numbers within their species group. The expected loss of plankton will impact the commercial and local fisheries that rely on plankton as a food source for the majority of marine life. Commercial fisheries are a multi-billion dollar business; in excess of $60 billion per year is spent of fish and shellfish (NOAA, 2008). Fishing provides the livelihoods for over 500 million people, with 90% of these living in developing countries and supporting entire communities (UN, 2009). Global fisheries are generally located in zones of upwelling water. Here nutrients are brought to the surface, bringing large concentrations of plankton, and therefore attracting schools of fish feeding. These areas are particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification, as lower pH water will be brought to the surface from upwelling deep water (Turley and Williamson, 2011). Fish is an important source of protein for around 1 billion people. As the population of the world increases, if the fisheries fail it could greatly affect global food security (UN, 2009).

The reduction of calcium carbonate and increase in oceanic acidity will lead to a decrease in coral reef formation and diminished resiliency to coral bleaching, a term which describes the death of a the symbiotic bacteria that live within the coral themselves. Many ecosystem services are provided to us through coral reefs. Corals are an important ground for fisheries, they provide shellfish, reef fish, and act as a nursery for commercial fish (European Science Foundation, 2009). Furthermore coral reefs protect coastal communities from events such as storm surges and hurricanes, if natural shoreline protection was compensated more expensive man made sea defences would be needed to replace the natural protection (NERC, 2009).

In some countries corals bring an important source of income, through tourism and cultural heritage, corals in the Great Barrier Reef are showing a recent decline in calcification (UN, 2009).  The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2009) estimated that the reef contributed to 8.6% of Australia’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for 2006-07, this is a highly significant portion for one tourism attraction.

Acidification could also lead to more rapid climate change, as it slows down the oceanic carbon pump, reducing the oceans ability to absorb additional CO2. This will lead to an increase in costs to cap the CO2 in the atmosphere (European Science Foundation, 2009).  Hood et al. (2009) have attempted to quantify the ecosystems service of carbon uptake by the oceans using the current price of carbon credits. They claimed that the oceanic uptake of CO2 was equal to an annual subsidy of 0.1-1% of the Gross World Product or $40-400 US billion.

Areas most affected by ocean acidification will be small island developing states, developing countries and coastal regions as they rely on services provided by marine ecosystems the most for their livelihoods (UN, 2009). The reduction in CO32- brought about by increased anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere will affect marine life, but to what extent is largely unknown as there is a scarcity of relevant data which inhibits the assessment of the possible impacts. Future research should focus on the possible reductions of ocean acidification and areas where the impacts are likely to be the greatest both for the human population and environment. Moreover the cumulative impacts of various environmental problems need to be predicted and mitigation options explored, such as rising sea levels, temperature combined with the possible effects of ocean acidification.

If this issue has got you thinking about what you could change about your lifestyle to become a little more environmentally friendly, why not take a look at Energy Saving Warehouse’s range of products to help you do just that?

References

European Science Foundation (2009) Impacts of Ocean Acidification. Science Briefing Policy. No: 37. France.

GBRMPA (2009). Research Publication No. 98: Economic Contribution of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, 2006-07. G.B.R.M.P. Authority. Queensland, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority: 19-21

Hood M. et al. (2009) Ocean Acidification: A summery for policy makers from the second symposium on the ocean in a high- CO2 world. The Second Symposium.

Iglesias-Rodriguez, D. M. (2008) Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world. Science. Vol: 320, 336-340.

IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Working group I: The Physical Science Basis. Chapter 10.4 Changes Associated with Biogeochemical Feedbacks and Ocean Acidification.

NOAA (2008) Ocean Acidification. State of the Science Fact Sheet. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. US Department of Commerce.

NRDC (2009) Ocean Acidification: The other CO2 problem. Natural Resources Defense Council.

Turley and Williamson (2011) Socio-Economic Aspects of Ocean Acidification. Report for UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice. Bonn, Germany.

UN (2009) Ocean Acidification: A hidden risk for Sustainable Development. UN-DESA Division for Sustainable Development. Copenhagen Policy Brief No 1.

Comments are closed.